Criminal Complaint In The Name Of Social Values! Why Are Avşar And Taşkın Targeted?

The Legal Clash: Two Contrasting Celebrities Face Lawsuit Over Allegations Of Undermining Public Morality And Inciting Hatred

ISTANBUL, Turkey – A civil society organization filed a criminal complaint against two figures. These figures dominate the Turkish media and social landscape. The lawsuit concerns Hülya Avşar and Merve Taşkın. Furthermore, the proceedings allege they undermined social values and general morality through their online activities and public statements. Experts now warn these Big Tech Privacy Scandals reveal a clash between digital freedom and social norms.

⚖️ The Charges: Why Is The Unlikely Duo Being Sued Together?

The Hülya Avşar Merve Taşkın Criminal Complaint stems from allegations that their separate actions created widespread public outrage. Legal representatives filed the complaint with the Istanbul Chief Public Prosecutor’s Office. They acted for the “Association for the Protection of Morality and Values.”

• Targeting Hülya Avşar (The Verbal Offense): The complaint focused on controversial comments Avşar made regarding income inequality and poverty. Complainants argue these statements carry a risk of inciting public hatred and hostility (TCK Article 216). Therefore, critics found her remarks socially damaging.
• Targeting Merve Taşkın (The Visual Offense): Taşkın was targeted for content she shared on social media and sites like OnlyFans. For this reason, the complaint requests that her posts be evaluated under charges of obscenity and disturbing public morality (TCK Article 226).

📝 Legal And Social Rationale

The association stated its objective is not to impose censorship. Instead, they aim to safeguard younger generations. They seek to prevent the normalization of behavior that conflicts with widely held social norms.

• Legal Rationale: The lawyers argue that the negative impact created by these public figures necessitated the Hülya Avşar Merve Taşkın Criminal Complaint. They believe the visible scale of the outrage warrants judicial review.
• Outlook: The Istanbul Chief Public Prosecutor’s Office will now determine if sufficient grounds exist to launch a formal investigation into both figures. As a result, the case highlights the tension between freedom of expression and the protection of public morals in Turkish law.